This year’s UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) represents a chance to realign environmental targets in the wake of the 2016 Paris Agreement which aimed to strengthen the global response to climate change by keeping the global temperature rise this century well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels.
Investors are also taking a more active role in ensuring long term incentive plans for executives align with appropriate environmental goals.
The financial services and investment community has been increasingly recognising its role in this challenge and continues to step up its efforts, either by putting pressure on corporates to transition to a low-carbon economy, by helping form and shape environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategies, or by focusing investment activities on achieving social impact.
For instance, the news that Legal & General sold down its equity stake in America’s largest oil company Exxon due to a failure to meet requirements on emissions reporting and targets highlights how investors are no longer turning a blind eye to climate issues. The fund manager is understood to have blacklisted a number of other stocks which have failed to meet minimum standards relating to climate change. Equally, Goldman Sachs recently stated that it has stopped financing new coal power plants unless they meet acceptable carbon emission levels.
Investors are also taking a more active role in ensuring long term incentive plans for executives align with appropriate environmental goals. For example, Royal Dutch Shell has linked its executive pay to agreed carbon emission targets, and BP is under pressure to follow suit.
The private equity industry increasingly recognises the potential value creation and downside risk protection through embedding ESG strategies in investment decisions.
This has in part been driven by the rising political and regulatory risk facing companies, but also by improvements in accounting and audit systems which have allowed companies to harness software tools to help manage, analyse and report on specific ESG KPIs.
Social impact funds
A noticeable change in the investment community has been the upsurge in private equity groups raising social impact funds which look to address social and environmental concerns alongside delivering financial returns.
Strategies often centre on the ability to reduce the level of consumption but can also look to improve operational performance and outcomes
Large buyout groups such as Bain, Partners Group, TPG Capital and KKR have raised flagship funds, with the latter two both agreeing to report on the impact of their investments based on principles laid out by the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation. It is generally accepted that social impact investors will need to play an important role in helping to plug the shortfall from public funds to help meet the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
To date, social impact funds have invested across a wide range of sectors such as education, energy, consulting, waste management and facilities management. Strategies often centre on the ability to reduce the level of consumption but can also look to improve operational performance and outcomes. The use of energy efficiency solutions is the most well-known and has received the highest level of investment. However, investors have also looked to deploy capital in sectors where the social benefit is less obvious.
Meanwhile, a sector which has been revitalised and is benefitting from increasingly developed ESG strategies is carbon offsetting. The industry, which is predominantly still voluntary based, provides a mechanism for companies to buy credits to fund projects that reduce the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.